Glad someone else has some sanity. For some people, paying SA to Microsoft makes them feel good. For us we bought it back in 2007 and haven't paid them a time (and probably won't until maybe later this year, or 2014). We flipped the userbase to Office 2010 2 years ago, so they really wouldn't notice much of any improvement from going to Exchange 2010/2013 -- we don't use OWA, we really don't want integration of our PBX/voicemail into our email server. Lync is the same issue -- Office Communicator 2007 R2 works really well. Both will have to be replaced in time simply because support for the 'older' platforms will start becoming a problem, but it won't be because of stability issues with 2007, or a raft of new features we don't need.
My network guys will groan a bit that they want to play with new tech, and I get that, but until I have a solid compelling argument to throw cash out, I'm not seeing it.
I think tasks worked for us, it was just notes. Funny to upgrade just because of notes, Microsoft is desperately trying to get rid of it. I think in OWA 2010 you can't even edit notes.
fillerguy wrote:
Absolutely. For us, migrating from 2007 to 2010/2013 would cost about $20k with no real benefit to the end user. I now have 2 z10 users complaining about lack of notes/tasks sync.
Another problem for us is we use client certificates to authenticate to active-sync - the z10 doesn't support this (Android/IOS do) - for some reason Blackberry allows using SCEP certs to be used on everything but activesync.
After using the z10 for about 10 minutes I was glad to hand it off to someone else (who is now complaining about it). Still think the company is doomed.