NewOldMiltonGuy wrote:
The losing candidate for Ward 1 has asked for Council to order a recount of votes.
Winning Candidate had 14 more votes than incumbent (second place).
Neither candidate had more then 500 votes.
While 14 votes may seem close, statistically it is a significant disparity. 14 votes out of 500 is just under 3%. To presume there is a 3% error in tabulations is an extraordinary claim and would really call into question all election results if true.
We were able to have electronic voting methods which traditionally reduces errors compared to human tabulation.
Bottom line, the losing candidate is asking us as taxpayers to pay for all costs associated with a recount. I personally feel this is a waste of money. I would hope Council would refuse this request as a waste of municipal tax dollars.
I personally dissagree. This is a small cost to protect and maintain faith in the election process. In most places a recount is automatic if margin is under a certain threashhold.
Also, when you calculate the difference, it is not over what a candidate got but over the overall number of votes casted for that ward, which will make the difference under 1%.