HawthorneVillager.com

Hawthorne Village (Milton) Discussion Board
It is currently Tue Jan 20, 2026 9:52 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:26 pm
Posts: 160
Looks like the Ancient Egyptians figured it out... why can't we?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvehA2IBgm4

Tesla was on the same track as well...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9oUq_S9IfM

I love YouTube! :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:42 pm
Posts: 841
MiltonChop wrote:
I agree with the fact that the "go green" initiative has been nothing short of a failure until now and that money is already being spent on solar and wind power and even looking west into the oil sands.

I'm just amazed that, yes while crude, bulky and expensive (what was available to him), some guy from New Jersey can figure out how to make, store and re-use clean, renewable energy while governments and corporations have spent millions on so called "experts" and "technology" and other initiatives with no significant progress ... I say hook this guy up with some brainiacs and industries to build a smaller cheaper system vs spending millions fiddling around with wind turbines and solar panels etc.


These types of installations have been going on in much larger scale in northern ontario for a last few years http://www.windenergy.uwaterloo.ca/proj_offgrid.php. They use a system with wind and hydrogen storage to replace or supplement existing diesel generation.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:35 pm 
Burrcold wrote:
Meh I've gotten used to this view of us "weak minded" liberals in ultra conservative Milton.


Shows how out of touch you are, to think Milton is "ultra Conservative". In fact, that's the dumbest thing I have read in a month.

You obviously are clueless about "ultra Conservatism" or you would know that there is almost none of that in Canada.

Come on Burrcold, surly you could add something intelligent to the conversation.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 2:39 pm
Posts: 122
MiltonChop wrote:
Anyone ever heard of Nikola Tesla? Supposedly he invented free wireless energy but they decided to go with copper wires instead...easier to meter and make profits! Look it up...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vX8cL9Bk ... ata_player


Tesla invented alternating current.


or, for a different kind of history lesson: :lol:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gOR91oentQ


Tesla was the electric Jesus!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:46 pm
Posts: 3429
Sandman wrote:
Burrcold wrote:
Meh I've gotten used to this view of us "weak minded" liberals in ultra conservative Milton.


Shows how out of touch you are, to think Milton is "ultra Conservative". In fact, that's the dumbest thing I have read in a month.

You obviously are clueless about "ultra Conservatism" or you would know that there is almost none of that in Canada.

Come on Burrcold, surly you could add something intelligent to the conversation.
I'm weak minded remember? Thanks, but I'd rather not spend any time arguing a topic with someone who has so much hatred towards liberals. You will just try and beat up everything I would have to say...just because I'm a leftist pig, right?

Oh and ultra conservative was used in a loose sense. I know what it is to be around true ultra conservatives, I used to live in a military town in North Carolina.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:49 pm 
Burrcold wrote:

Oh and "ultra conservative" was used in a loose sense. I know what it is to be around true ultra conservatives, I used to live in a military town in North Carolina.


Now this is making even less sense.

If you know the true meaning of "ultra conservative" from your time in NC, then it is even stranger that you would suggest Milton is an "ultra conservative" community.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:46 pm
Posts: 3429
Sandman wrote:
Burrcold wrote:

Oh and "ultra conservative" was used in a loose sense. I know what it is to be around true ultra conservatives, I used to live in a military town in North Carolina.


Now this is making even less sense.

If you know the true meaning of "ultra conservative" from your time in NC, then it is even stranger that you would suggest Milton is an "ultra conservative" community.
Not playing your stupid ass games. Done.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:12 am
Posts: 4609
OneWiredMouse wrote:
Anthony wrote:
[
+1 to this!

The reality is that the hydro generated by those solar panels you see on people's roof's is being paid for by all of us collectively, and at a ridiculous rate thanks to the Liberals deciding to pay 10x the going rate for hydro generated by those panels. It's all well and good for the people who have them installed to be making money from them, but personally every time I see them I think "gee, thanks so much for helping to raise everyone's hydro rates just so you can "save the planet", cough cough". Forget about the fact that it's coming at the expense of everyone around you.

I think whoever came up with this stupid scheme and the rates associated with it should be slapped silly. Dalton is an idiot, those who voted for him are idiots (especially if you voted for him more than once), and IMO those panels should be ripped off every roof and shoved up McGuinty's ass! If you want to save the planet, that's a hell of a start.


The energy generated from microFIT systems has little to no impact on the overall rates in Ontario. As of March 30th 102 MW of microFit was in operation in Ontario. That is less than 0.5% of our overall demand and solar is only online for a limited number of hours per day, so the kWh contribution is probably less than 0.1% of the total.


Just because they aren't contributing much to the grid, dosen't mean it isn't costing a fortune. Go find some figures on how much the program is costing in dollars and tell me if you still think it's not contributing to skyrocketing rates.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 3:17 pm
Posts: 3525
From the Globe and Mail:
Energy Minister Chris Bentley says green energy accounts for only about five per cent of the increase in electricity bills.

He says the largest part of the hikes, which are expected to total 46 per cent over five years, are to pay for much needed upgrades to the province’s electrical grid.

Now some people I know will automatically discount that statement because it's a Liberal minister. But I don't doubt it. Upgrading an aging transmission and distribution system is not cheap!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 3:17 pm
Posts: 3525
Fixing the mess at Pickering certainly wasn't cheap. Putting in a third tunnel for increasing capacity at Sir Adam Beck was to the tune of 1.6B. Refurb of Bruce Nuclear units 1 and 2 was a bit over 5B, plus new transmission capacity from Bruce was added.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 9:10 pm
Posts: 2288
What's with all the statistics-toting apologists? Bottom line, this is a huge amount of money being flushed down the toilet, no matter how it's couched in percentage-of-a-total statistics.

OneWiredMouse wrote:
As of March 30th 102 MW of microFit was in operation in Ontario. That is less than 0.5% of our overall demand ...

That's one two-hundredth of a ginormous number.

freemantrailfamily wrote:
From the Globe and Mail:
Energy Minister Chris Bentley says green energy accounts for only about five per cent of the increase in electricity bills.

*Only* five per cent? Five percent of the cumulative cost of every single home and business's electrical bill in a year is.... well, I don't know what it is but for sure it is A FRICKING LOT OF MONEY.

freemantrailfamily wrote:
He says the largest part of the hikes, which are expected to total 46 per cent over five years, are to pay for much needed upgrades to the province’s electrical grid.

Now some people I know will automatically discount that statement because it's a Liberal minister. But I don't doubt it. Upgrading an aging transmission and distribution system is not cheap!

I don't discount it because it's from a Liberal minister. Well, okay, yes I do. But that's not the only reason.

Mainly I discount it because it has nothing to do with the price of tea in China. He's playing sleight of hand, trying to get us to take our eye off the ball. So the grid needs to be upgraded ... okay, fine. Why does that make it okay for them to cause 5% energy hikes (aka a fricking lot of money) for their pet projects? Answer: it shouldn't. And we shouldn't let them get away with changing the subject.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:42 pm
Posts: 841
bremer wrote:

Just because they aren't contributing much to the grid, dosen't mean it isn't costing a fortune. Go find some figures on how much the program is costing in dollars and tell me if you still think it's not contributing to skyrocketing rates.


Can you define skyrocketing? The new peak rate effective May 1 2012 is 11.7 cents/kWh. The May 1st 2006 peak rate was 10.5 cents/kWh. From 2006 to 2008 commodity prices dropped then have increased slightly every six months since then. As for program costs I'm not aware of what the OPA's expenses are to administer these programs but for larger FIT installations the admin costs are passed onto the customer. At the utility level all costs are passed onto the customer (ie meter, transformer, pole lines, engineering costs, etc). So the only contributing rate increase factor I can see is the difference in commodity price and as I wrote before this is basically noise in the big picture.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.010s | 9 Queries | GZIP : Off ]